Platformonomics TGIF #126: May 8, 2026

By

Abstract logo featuring dark mountain silhouettes against a white background, with a curved grey line below the mountains.

Platformonomics TGIF is a weekly roll-up of links, comments on those links, and perhaps a little too much tugging on my favorite threads.

No newsletter next week.

The visit to Cleveland is happening. Reach out if you’re interested in joining to see what Seattle can learn from a city whose economic model fractured, whose policymakers compounded the problems, and which is still trying to recover 70 years later.

News

Never Take a Dependency on Elon Musk: Anthropic Edition

Text announcement about a new partnership between SpaceXAI and Anthropic to provide access to Colossus 1.

Space Twitter continues its transition from self-proclaimed frontier lab to neocloud.

The statement emphasizes the speed with which Colossus 1 was deployed, which is an odd value proposition. Being able to stand up infrastructure quickly doesn’t matter if you can’t write software to take advantage of it. Elon has promised leading edge software so many times (Full Self Driving is into decade two of promises, the next version of Grok is always going to be superlative, etc.) yet never delivered. One might almost conclude he’s just not a software guy. When he says “xAI was not built right first time around, so is being rebuilt from the foundations up”, who is that on? Why will the next effort go better?

But Elon the IPO salesman got what he needed out of the announce:

As part of this agreement, Anthropic also expressed interest in partnering to develop multiple gigawatts of orbital AI compute capacity.

100x revenue valuation (aka the Price-to-Elon ratio) here we come!

And Elon the schizophrenic AI safety enthusiast (aka “safety for thee, but not me”) also made an appearance:

A tweet from Elon Musk discussing his positive impressions of the Anthropic team and their work on the AI Claude.

Would it be cynical to conclude his oft-professed philosophical and political views are entirely contingent on his commercial interests?

And in case the risks of taking an Elon dependency were not already abundantly clear, he made it explicit:

Tweet from Simon Willison discussing Elon Musk's statement about reclaiming compute from harmful AI.

(I’d invite you to define “harm humanity”, but clearly that is reserved for Elon).

Private Equity in Action: “We’re ‘AI Winners’, Really”

Headline announcing Anthropic's $1.5 billion joint venture with Wall Street firms, highlighting investments from Blackstone, Hellman & Friedman, and Goldman Sachs.
Text announcing OpenAI's $10 billion joint venture with private equity firms for AI deployment.

Good way to extract whatever cash is left at all those software companies PE bought!

The Necessity of Billionaires

Headline about the Seattle Seahawks sale mentioning bidders Wyc Grousbeck, Aditya Mittal, and Vinod Khosla.

Don’t progressives logically have to make the leap from “billionaires shouldn’t exist” to “sport teams shouldn’t exist”?

2 responses

  1. There was a senior Microsoft person who was was often quoted for saying:
    “We need to fucus on our partners and turn them all into weiners”. 🙂

  2. Charles Fitzgerald Avatar

    I do recall that! More Fucus!

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Get Updates By Email

Discover more from Platformonomics

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading