
Platformonomics TGIF is a weekly roll-up of links, comments on those links, and perhaps a little too much tugging on my favorite threads.
Get Platformonomics Updates By Email
News
Socrates Says Writing Will Rot Your Brain

Academics Say ChatGPT Will Rot Your Brain

This is a small and easy to critique study, but still got tons of coverage. The media love to amplify pessimism about innovation, yet have almost no interest in exploring potential positives. The New York Times model of (ironically) standing athwart history yelling stop at anything new is a problem for Western Civilization.

The US (and Anglosphere broadly) being worse than Europe is truly terrifying (and I know nothing about the particulars of this survey). The AI Doomers are no doubt taking a victory lap (in their bunkers).
Previous:
No Product, No Customers, No Revenue. Very Safe!, The Arc of the Generative AI Universe Bends Towards Cash: Anthropic Edition, Where Do We Deport AI Safety People To?, Competitive Strategy: AI Safety Edition, We Can Only Hope, Whatever Happened to the AI Safety People?, Everyone In Silicon Valley Wants To Be Henry Kissinger, Existential Risk Now Has a Precise Threshold, You Can’t Spell Alien Invasion Without A and I, Existential AI Risk + Twitter-level Nuance, Media Self-Harm: Time Magazine Edition, Existential Corner: What is the New York Times? Living in a Glass House: The New York Times On Tech, Living in a Glass House: What is the New York Times?, Aspiring Technology Company Neither Interested in Technology Nor Understands Technology
Antitrust Incoherence: Don’t Make Me Complain to the Authorities About a Deal I Signed but Want to Renegotiate

Antitrust is becoming meaningless (as I may have mentioned here). It is now seen as a opportunity for “do-overs”, a way to hurt competitors, and a tool to punish your political foes (as demonstrated by both the Biden and Trump administrations). After nearly a century of work to define clear red lines and strive for repeatable outcomes, antitrust has sunk back into the swamp of incoherence (or, what we call the European model).
This certainly doesn’t make Open AI’s negotiating position look strong. Microsoft replies with “fine, instead of renegotiating, we can just keep the current deal”.

Microsoft is prepared to walk away from high-stakes negotiations with OpenAI over the future of its multibillion-dollar alliance, as the ChatGPT maker seeks to convert into a for-profit company.
The software giant has considered halting complex discussions with the $300bn artificial intelligence start-up if the two sides remain unable to agree on critical issues, such as the size of Microsoft’s future stake in OpenAI, said people with knowledge of its plans.
In this eventuality, Microsoft would rely on its existing commercial contract to retain access to OpenAI’s technology until 2030, unless there was an offer that was equal to or better than its current arrangements, these people said.
Meanwhile, Stargate is “not yet formed” and Softbank has gone very quiet. And Open AI is behind even database vampire Oracle on the very steep and long CAPEX learning curve.
Previous:
Pedal to the Meta: Hipster Antitrust’s Day in Court, A New Antitrust Doctrine, Antitrust Incoherence: The Emerging Trump Doctrine?, Antitrust Incoherence: The Consistently Incoherent Lina Khan, Antitrust Incoherence: New Administration, Continuity of Incoherence, Antitrust Incoherence: Google Breakup Rumors, Antitrust Incoherence: Breaking Up Google #monopolist, Antitrust Incoherence: Google Verdict,Antitrust Incoherence: Competitive Harassment Edition, Antitrust Incoherence: Don’t Forget Microsoft, Antitrust Incoherence: Isn’t Market Division Illegal?, Antitrust Incoherence: Roomba Aftermath Edition, Antitrust Incoherence: Apple Edition, Antitrust Incoherence: Spotify Edition, Antitrust Incoherence: Roomba Edition, The Incoherence Doctrine: The FTC Strikes Again, The DOJ Play at Home Game, Stargate: So Many Mouths to Feed, CAPEX Clues: Softbank Needs More Cash, Stargate: $5 Trillion and Counting, Stargate: A New Hope?, Why Can’t Oracle Build Data Centers? FY25 Q4 Edition
Attention Meta AI Employees…

(This assumes there is anyone left).
You’re no doubt wondering about your participation in the new compensation plan. Do you ask for fifty million dollars to stay (and still be massively underpaid relative to your new peers)? If you’re just a median employee, how does this trickle down the organization to you? Get on your manager’s calendar now, as there are going to be a lot of these discussions.
No other Big Tech company even remotely swings between sentiment extremes like Meta. Just months ago Meta seemed like a key foundation model player. But after Llama 4 revealed itself to be a platypus and laid an egg, Meta is now blotting out the sky with enormous plumes of AI desperation from multiple cash bonfires (ramping CAPEX spend, $100 million bonuses, the already under question Scale AI acquisition, buying out NFDG, and other acquisition attempts). Hail Mary much?
CAPEX Clues: xAI Investor Marketing Materials

So xAI is telling investors it plans to spend $10.3 billion on CAPEX in 2025. If we compare to 2024 HyperCAPEX spend, that is 19% of AWS, 20% of Google, 26% of Meta and 14% of Microsoft (and they’ll all grow this year). Embarrassingly, that is only about two-thirds of ClownWatch™ poster child Oracle’s bonsai spend. We’ll leave out the cumulative CAPEX spend comparison (for now).
Tragically we can’t dig into the very optimistic revenue assumptions (how much of that is forecast from enterprises flocking to Grok and its “unauthorized modifications“?). CAPEX peaking in Q3 to give way to a Free Cash Flow hockey stick looks more than a little massaged. But sure, never bet against Elon, the man behind the Cybertruck, a million robotaxis on the road since 2020, and $2 trillion in Federal budget savings.
Previous:
Never Take a Dependency on Elon Musk: Where to Even Start?, Never Take a Dependency on Elon Musk: Chapter 150, Never Take a Dependency on Elon Musk: Grok API Edition, Do Not Take a Dependency on Elon Musk: Chapter 147, Do Not Take a Dependency on Elon Musk: Chapter 148, Do Not Take a Dependency on Elon Musk: Chapter 149, Elon Announces $97.4 Billion Spite Budget, Pollyanna Showdown, Elon Musk Threatens to Ban Oracle?, Who’s Getting the GPUs? Elon Shell Game Edition
Not Available in Europe: WhatsApp Edition

The digital world continues to fragment, though in this case Europe is missing out on “innovation” (as Meta likes to call their ad targeting), as opposed to end user innovation.
Lest you didn’t think EU regulation was arbitrary enough, the Digital Markets Act is now a card in broader trade negotiations, to the benefit of Apple and Meta. Google was not so lucky, and lost its appeal over Android’s very existence being a violation of EU regulations.
Previous:
Not Available in Europe: ChatGPT Memory Edition, Not Available in Europe: Bird Flies, Not Available in Europe: Open AI Deep Research, Not Available in Europe: A Bubbly Economy, Not Available in Europe: Better Late Than Never Apple Edition, Not Available in Europe: Apple’s Math, Not Available in Europe: This Week’s Edition, Not Available in Europe: Coming Soon to a Continent Near You, Not Available in Europe: Don’t Say You Weren’t Warned (by Meta), Not Available in Europe: A Tipping Point?, Not Available in Europe: Stratechery Edition, Not Available in Europe: Apple Edition, Not Available in Europe: Meta Edition
